A leaky house can fool the sun but it can't fool the rain.
In my previous post, I wrote some about DINEPA, the Haitian
government’s water and sanitation department, and our complicated relationship
and history with them.
Shopping for water system supplies a week or two ago, I
actually encountered the DINEPA representative for Central Haiti where I am
living. It was tense. He was not exactly pleased to see another Clemson
engineer from a village where they give out clean water for free.
He knows, as well as I, that in order to build and maintain
sustainable water systems, the community must take responsibility for it. If
Haiti is ever going to free itself from its dependence on foreign aid, it must
start paying for this basic amenity internally through taxes or some other form
of fund collection from the people.
The water system in my village was constructed and is
maintained by funds from the United States. The people have never had to pay
for water. Asking them to pay for water now, after receiving it for free for so
long now, would incite protests and riots and hundreds of people would once
again be exposed to the dangers of contaminated water.
When the DINEPA agent recognized me, he saw a person who is
almost actively undermining his goals, a person handing out free water courtesy
of American donors. How can he ask another village to fund their own system
when they could point to my village and its free water? How can I ask another
village to fund their own system when they could point to another village and
its free water?
Of course if DINEPA was efficient and successful then I
wouldn’t be here in the first place. They have a history of constructing poorly
designed water systems and the people know it. All the villages I have visited
so far do not trust their own government to provide for them and for a good
reason.
For example, here is a picture of a cistern and treatment
system they have built. The treatment is inside the little building on top.
Here is a picture of the treatment they have inside right
now:
As you can see, it’s missing a few vital components. Maybe
all components.
DINEPA and Clemson Engineers for Developing Countries each
have their strengths and weaknesses. They each have constructed water systems
that are unsustainable due to poor treatment or poor community development.
They each have a lot to learn. They each want to keep striving for sustainable
water systems but these is where their goals diverge.
CEDC earnestly hopes that that DINEPA will one day surpass
it in quality and efficiency. Personally, nothing would make me happier than
for my job, as an expatriate engineer in Haiti, not to exist in 10 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment